A Disaster Triggered by Paper Stock Certificates: Historical Wounds of the Capital Market
The report begins by reviewing the "Document Crisis" on Wall Street in the 1960s. At that time, trading volume surged, but trading still relied on manual and paper stock certificate processing, leading to broker settlement delays, massive trading failures, and even the need to suspend trading days to "catch up" on back-office operations:
The New York Stock Exchange reported in 1968 that over $2.6 billion in securities could not be successfully delivered that year, ultimately causing more than 100 brokers to collapse.
This crisis prompted Congress and the SEC to undertake massive reforms, including establishing the Securities Investor Protection Act, strengthening clearing mechanisms, and ultimately forming today's highly intermediated securities trading system.
Expanding the Current Capital Market Structure: "Efficiency Dilemma" and "Monopoly Risk" Coexist
Although the initial intention was to solve information asymmetry and market manipulation issues, the report points out that today's market structure has become an obstacle to efficiency:
From brokers, market makers, clearing institutions, transfer agents, registrars to data platforms, each intermediary not only extracts fees but also forms information monopolies, increases friction costs, and concentrates risks.
For example, almost all US stock trading clearing is currently handled by the DTC and NSCC departments under the US Depository Trust & Clearing Company (DTCC), and this centralized structure has formed a de facto monopoly. The "Street Name Registration" system further disconnects investors from issuing companies, increasing regulatory and communication costs.
The so-called "Street Name Registration" means that when people buy stocks through brokers, the legal owner of the stocks is not themselves, but registered under the broker or other nominee shareholders, raising concerns about information opacity, shareholder rights dilution, and risks concentrated in intermediaries.
Financial Potential of Capital Block Chain: Reconstructing the Basic Logic of Trading
The report further points out that Block Chain and asset tokenization technology can fundamentally restructure the capital market structure. Its five major advantages include:
Disintermediation: Transactions can be completed through smart contracts and decentralized exchanges (DEX), eliminating multiple intermediaries.
Instant Clearing: Block Chain enables atomic transactions without T+1 delays, reducing counterparty risks.
Transparency: All transactions can be verified on-chain, enhancing regulatory and investor trust.
Programmable Finance: Complex functions like automatic clearing, conditional contract execution, and trustless escrow can be designed.
Greater Resilience: The decentralized Block Chain architecture reduces single point of failure risks and enhances financial system stability.
Le states: "If this technology had existed in the 1960s, the overall landscape of capital markets might have been completely different."
Technology is Not a Panacea: The Next Step in Risk Awareness and Regulation
Additionally, the report does not shy away from discussing potential problems in Block Chain systems, including smart contract vulnerabilities, private key loss risks, on-chain information abuse or manipulation, etc. Especially in a decentralized architecture, the lack of clear liability attribution and regulatory targets also makes anti-money laundering and consumer protection major challenges:
Whether it's the DEX "sandwich attack", MEV issues, or potential risks in CEX such as asset misappropriation and insider trading, these all need to be addressed through institutional design and regulatory innovation.
Legislative Voices Rising: An Opportunity to Build the Next-Generation Financial Market
The report points out that the United States is promoting multiple legislative drafts such as the 21st Century Financial Innovation and Technology Act (FIT21) and the Lummis and Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA), which are key moments in building a new financial framework.
Le argues that regulation should move beyond the old mindset of "whether crypto assets are securities or commodities" and shift towards exploring "how to make the infrastructure of capital markets more efficient and transparent":
The common focus is designing a modernized market regulatory framework that can preserve the advantages of blockchain while mitigating new risks.
Traditional Assets Will Eventually Go "On-Chain", Redefining Financial Markets
The report finally predicts that the ultimate value of crypto technology is not in trading Bitcoin or Non-Fungible Tokens, but as the backbone of future capital markets. Le summarizes: "Stocks, bonds, funds, and even real estate will ultimately be tokenized and 'go on-chain', making the global financial system more open, democratic, and efficient."
This is not just a new technology, but an opportunity to build the financial future. We cannot miss it.
Risk Warning
Cryptocurrency investment carries high risks, and its price may fluctuate dramatically. You may lose all of your principal. Please carefully assess the risks.