The moment most similar to President Trump's "Liberation Day" declaration in U.S. history might be the "Nixon Shock" on August 15, 1971. That evening, President Nixon announced a comprehensive 10% tariff and ended the system of converting dollars to gold - a system that had supported the global trade and financial system since the end of World War II. This action triggered diplomatic activities between the United States and other countries, ultimately reaching the Smithsonian Agreement in December 1971, where other countries agreed to revalue their currencies relative to the dollar. The dollar ultimately depreciated by 27% between the second quarter of 1971 and the third quarter of 1978. In the past 50 years, there have been several instances of trade tensions followed by a weakening dollar (partially negotiated).
Recent trade tensions are expected to again lead to continued dollar weakness. According to relevant indicators, the U.S. dollar is already overvalued, the Federal Reserve has room to lower interest rates, and the White House wants to reduce the U.S. trade deficit. Although tariffs will change effective import and export prices, dollar depreciation may gradually rebalance trade flows through market mechanisms, thereby achieving the expected effect.
Child of the Era - Bit
The sudden changes in U.S. trade policy are causing adjustments in financial markets, which will have short-term negative economic impacts. However, the market conditions of the past week are unlikely to be the norm for the next four years. The Trump administration is implementing a series of policy measures that will have different impacts on GDP growth, inflation, and trade deficits. For example, while tariffs may reduce economic growth and increase inflation (causing stagflation), certain types of deregulation may increase growth and reduce inflation (reducing stagflation), with the final result depending on the extent to which the White House implements its policy agenda in these areas.
Despite the uncertain prospects, the best guess is that U.S. government policies will lead to continued dollar weakness and overall inflation above the target within the next 1 to 3 years. Tariffs themselves may slow growth, but this impact may be partially offset by tax cuts, deregulation, and dollar depreciation. If the White House also actively pursues other growth-promoting policies, GDP growth may remain relatively good despite the initial tariff shock. Regardless of actual growth, history shows that sustained inflationary pressures over a period may be favorable for scarce commodities like Bit and gold.
Moreover, like gold in the 1970s, Bit now has a rapidly improving market structure - supported by changes in U.S. government policies. This year, the White House has implemented a series of broad policy changes that should support investment in the digital asset industry, including withdrawing a series of lawsuits, ensuring asset applicability to traditional commercial banks, and allowing regulated institutions (such as custodians) to provide cryptocurrency services. This, in turn, has triggered a wave of mergers and acquisitions and other strategic investments. New tariffs are a short-term negative factor for the valuation of digital assets like Bit, but the Trump administration's cryptocurrency-specific policies have consistently supported the industry. Overall, the increased macro-economic demand for scarce commodity assets and the improved investor operating environment may be a powerful combination for widespread Bit adoption in the coming years.
Welcome to join BlockBeats official community:
Telegram subscription group: https://t.me/theblockbeats
Telegram exchange group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App
Twitter official account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia