I'm tired, let's first clarify the issue with your frozen channels. It seems like no one knows whether it's a problem with user funds or your upstream channels. If you were completely compliant, why would your upstream channels have issues?
Secondly, I never said you were a compliant exchange in the United States. The problem is that you yourselves boast about being a compliant exchange, not me. I've told many of your colleagues that if you hadn't claimed to be a compliant exchange, I wouldn't have said a word.
Who was it that claimed to be a compliant exchange based on SEC registration and MSB, if not you? Wasn't it you who claimed to have formally obtained qualifications for issuing security tokens in the United States? Isn't this image not photoshopped by me, but still pinned on your own platform?
Then, what about Fidelity's $50 million? Tell me, why do you claim to have Fidelity's custody just by presenting a so-called "asset proof"? Do you believe Fidelity won't sue you?
There's no problem with being non-compliant; many in the crypto space are non-compliant. That's normal, but if you're not compliant yet insist on waving the compliance flag, that's called fraud, and it's called fraud anywhere.
Additionally, I suggest you focus on resolving your upstream issues rather than arguing with me. Their investigation of you is what truly matters. Wasting effort on me won't help you one bit.
