The on-chain craze is resurrected. A horizontal comparison of the three major LaunchPads and their popular tokens

avatar
MarsBit
3 days ago
This article is machine translated
Show original
Here is the English translation: Launchpad is a decentralized platform, typically operated by blockchain projects or decentralized exchanges (DEX), used to help emerging blockchain projects issue tokens to the public through IDO. These platforms provide fundraising channels for project parties while offering investors early opportunities to participate in quality projects. The Launchpad introduced in this article is more focused on meme launch platforms, which differ from traditional Launchpads in that the token market value is lower, nearly 100% circulating, most tokens are memes, the token issuance threshold is low for users, and the potential wealth effect is higher.

[Rest of the translation follows the same professional and accurate approach, maintaining the original structure and meaning while translating to English]

  • After the successful Genesis Launch, go to the Agent page to receive the purchased tokens.
  • If the launch fails, all points and $VIRTUAL will be fully refunded.

In summary, Virtuals Protocol is creating a smaller-scale, more loyal LaunchPad, somewhat similar to the recent token launch activity on Binance Wallet, essentially hoping that users will participate more in the ecosystem. If one continues to be optimistic about Virtual's system, there are three ways to participate:

  1. Directly long $VIRTUAL tokens
  2. Directly long $VADER tokens
  3. Participate in the activity

The first two options are straightforward, and both $VIRTUAL & $VADER have shown surprising gains recently, benefiting the most from the activity. To participate, one must first accumulate points, which can be done by holding $VIRTUAL tokens in the wallet. If concerned about potential $VIRTUAL price drops, one can short the same number of $VIRTUAL tokens on a centralized exchange. The advantage is ensuring participation in the activity without being consumed by potential price declines, and the activity is designed not to lose money, only potentially yielding less than expected. The drawback is that additional capital is needed for shorting, which will significantly reduce overall fund utilization.

Conclusion

Overall, Pump Fun, LetsBonk, and Virtuals Protocol each have their advantages and concerns: Pump Fun solidifies traffic entry through aggressive selling and high-profit models, but is questioned due to frequent "cashing out" and negative events; LetsBonk shows goodwill to the ecosystem through deep community engagement and low-fee profit sharing, but the attention on platform and secondary tokens is dispersed, and long-term participation remains to be seen; Virtuals Protocol's point mechanism and AI Agent layout for new tracks are innovative, but have yet to demonstrate stable issuance energy, and user enthusiasm remains to be observed.

Looking ahead, the next wave of LaunchPad tracks hinges on "value realization" and "community resilience": Can platforms design mechanisms that balance short-term enthusiasm and long-term ecosystem building? Can project parties continuously provide real utility, rather than relying on grand narratives? After hot money recedes, which model is more sustainable will be a key market test. For researchers and participants, beyond tracking platform traffic and token price fluctuations, one should deeply examine the core risks and future upgrade potential of each mechanism to find the truly worthwhile long-term bet amidst the hundred schools of thought.

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments