Consensus Essay: A consensus conference with the least consensus

This article is machine translated
Show original

Author: Haotian

Sharing a short essay on the recent Consensus conference in Hong Kong:

1) Similar to previous conference runs, many people were running around the side events around the main venue, and coupled with unfamiliarity with the HK map, the running around and dinner meetings left everyone's legs and feet exhausted, with physical fatigue beyond description. But that's not a big deal, the mental exhaustion is even more tiring, with no end in sight.

2) Despite the overall environment, the various events were still crowded with people, and the mood did not seem bearish at all. Perhaps most people came for the "emotional value". The Solana ecosystem seems to be the crowd favorite, with events consistently packed and even catching the attention of the authorities. In comparison, activities related to Ethereum, BTC layer2, etc. were much more gloomy. It's just a mess, with everyone taking turns to shine; they too had their moments of glory in the past.

3) Although it's called the Consensus conference, after interacting with more people, it feels like the least "consensual" Consensus conference? The "consensus" in the industry is being seriously torn apart. The technical narrative PVE consensus is overshadowed by the MEME narrative PVP consensus, the diamond-handed holder's consensus is too shy to speak up in the face of the young P-trader's consensus, and the veteran technical build consensus is out of place in front of some marketing Tokenomics-shining projects. Seemingly a division of consensus, but in fact it is the collapse of the industry's "unified" values. After Consensus, Polarization may become the norm.

4) Many crypto veterans have responded that "the market environment has changed". In fact, the market is never wrong, it's just that the old-timers' "empiricism" is no longer applicable. The old-timers used the logic of the two-cycle bull-bear conversion to trade coins, but found that the four-year cycle conversion was invalid. The market defines the bull market around the hot narrative, coming like the wind and leaving without a trace. By the time you're still confident that the bull market has just begun, it's already over.

5) No need to complain that it's getting harder to make money in the market, it's just that the audience group making money has changed, and the mode and logic of making money has changed. Now there are countless market assets, and market attention (Mindshare) controls the flow of wealth. The young 00s P-traders who dare to rush in, make money and run, have the energy and courage, and have become the lucky ones in this round of PVP narrative. In comparison, the old-timers' diamond-handed PVE mindset has no chance of winning. But every PVP wealth feast eventually has a massive withdrawal of liquidity, and it's unclear how long this squid game can last.

6) I can feel the melancholy of a group of technology narrative idealists and Builders. This sense of disappointment is different from the past. In the words of an old OG, the technical Roadmap has been implemented step by step, the TGE has been done as required, the community has also been maintained, and the narrative has been continuously updated to match the hot spots, but the coin price just won't go up. For those who do things with idealism, if they can't get the corresponding rewards from the market in the long run, does it mean the exhaustion of innovative power? If the crypto world loses the idealistic hacker spirit, what spirit will the Crypto industry use to counter the casino stigma from the outside world? How, do we not even need to pretend anymore?

7) The people in the AI Agent car have basically all been trapped, but most people still firmly believe in the future of the AI + Crypto narrative. I've always emphasized that, putting aside the short-term application value of AI Agent landing, the activation value of AI Agent for the old narratives like layer2, ZK, modularization, chain abstraction, etc. is the key. It can give the old narratives new build directions, and give the unlanded infra the possibility of application prerequisites. In short, the sacrifices brought by the current AI Agent bubble burst are negligible compared to its future reconstruction value of the industry's bottom-up.

8) The logic of the secondary market has completely changed. BTC is shining alone in the sky with the support of ETF off-market capital, while ETH and SOL, BSC are fighting fiercely at the ecological level, but no matter how they fight, the market unanimously believes that there is no overall bull market, no altcoin season. The choice of locomotive determines the harvest, and if you choose the wrong one, the result will be embarrassing, for example, if you are unfortunate enough to be on the side of layer2.

9) The on-chain world has become the hope for most people in the crypto world, but compared to the difficulty of making money in the CEX secondary market, the pure PVP environment on the chain is also a huge challenge for the majority of the audience. After the chaotic and disorderly era, the on-chain world must achieve a full-chain connection through asset issuance, community cohesion, CEX connection, and technical application landing. Obviously, a on-chain story without asset issuance threshold restrictions and continuous technical innovation empowerment cannot truly change the Crypto world.

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments