Odaily星球日报讯 pump.fun 联合创始人 Alon Cohen 于 X 发文表示：“我对过去几天围绕 LIBRA 发生的事件感到厌恶。这个项目背后的人以牺牲许多用户、生态系统甚至整个国家为代价获得了可观的个人利益。我希望责任方得到应有的惩罚。 我知道情况仍在发展，所以如果你知道生态系统中任何参与者的不当行为，无论大小，你都应该站出来。我也知道有些人可能处境艰难，所以我的 DM 是开放的，以便我能提供帮助。 这个周末的事件尤其令人痛心，因为 pump.fun 的建立是为了明确解决过去几天暴露的一些问题。最重要的是，像'开发团队'和做市商这样的中间人参与其中是荒谬的——创建一个 Meme 币应该非常简单，任何人都可以做到。仅仅存在这样的参与者就意味着任何人都很容易被利用。 由于这些事件造成的破坏，许多人表示这可能是‘Meme 币的终结’。 虽然我同情那些希望看到 Meme 币终结的人，因为他们厌倦了此类事件的发生，但事实是，用户对无需许可的链上创建/投机的需求不会消失。 你在 Meme 币领域看到的相同核心用户行为以前就存在过——无论是狗狗币、IC0 热潮、NFT/DeFi——在日益受关注的经济中，毫无疑问，用户将继续想要交易世界事件、文化、技术等等。 话虽如此，平台提供护栏以确保用户尽可能安全同时满足他们的需求非常重要。以下是我对实现这一目标应关注的一些事项的看法： 1）教育用户如何安全且合乎道德地创建代币 2）新交易者的引入需要更友好 3）在界面层面需要更加重视用户保护 虽然没有一个无需许可的平台可以完全消除链上的不良结果，但界面可以通过降低显示可疑交易模式的代币可见性、设置合理的默认滑点设置（提示：滑点小于 20%）等方式来创建更安全的环境。”

Odaily星球日报讯 pump.fun 联合创始人 Alon Cohen 于 X 发文表示：“我对过去几天围绕 LIBRA 发生的事件感到厌恶。这个项目背后的人以牺牲许多用户、生态系统甚至整个国家为代价获得了可观的个人利益。我希望责任方得到应有的惩罚。我知道情况仍在发展，所以如果你知道生态系统中任何参与者的不当行为，无论大小，你都应该站出来。我也知道有些人可能处境艰难，所以我的 DM 是开放的，以便我能提供帮助。这个周末的事件尤其令人痛心，因为 pump.fun 的建立是为了明确解决过去几天暴露的一些问题。最重要的是，像'开发团队'和做市商这样的中间人参与其中是荒谬的——创建一个 Meme 币应该非常简单，任何人都可以做到。仅仅存在这样的参与者就意味着任何人都很容易被利用。由于这些事件造成的破坏，许多人表示这可能是‘Meme 币的终结’。虽然我同情那些希望看到 Meme 币终结的人，因为他们厌倦了此类事件的发生，但事实是，用户对无需许可的链上创建/投机的需求不会消失。你在 Meme 币领域看到的相同核心用户行为以前就存在过——无论是狗狗币、IC0 热潮、NFT/DeFi——在日益受关注的经济中，毫无疑问，用户将继续想要交易世界事件、文化、技术等等。话虽如此，平台提供护栏以确保用户尽可能安全同时满足他们的需求非常重要。以下是我对实现这一目标应关注的一些事项的看法：1）教育用户如何安全且合乎道德地创建代币2）新交易者的引入需要更友好3）在界面层面需要更加重视用户保护虽然没有一个无需许可的平台可以完全消除链上的不良结果，但界面可以通过降低显示可疑交易模式的代币可见性、设置合理的默认滑点设置（提示：滑点小于 20%）等方式来创建更安全的环境。”

pump.fun联创：希望LIBRA事件责任方得到惩罚，用户对无需许可链上创建/投机的需求不会消失

Odaily News reported that Alon Cohen, the co-founder of pump.fun, posted on X stating: "I am disgusted by the events surrounding LIBRA over the past few days. The people behind this project have gained significant personal benefits at the expense of many users, the ecosystem, and even entire countries. I hope the responsible parties are duly punished. I know the situation is still evolving, so if you are aware of any misconduct by any participants in the ecosystem, no matter how small, you should speak up. I also know that some people may be in difficult situations, so my DM is open so that I can provide assistance. The events of this weekend were particularly heartbreaking, as pump.fun was established to explicitly address some of the issues exposed over the past few days. Most importantly, the involvement of intermediaries such as 'development teams' and market makers is absurd - creating a Meme coin should be very simple, and anyone should be able to do it. The mere existence of such participants means that anyone can easily be exploited. Due to the damage caused by these events, many have stated that this could be the 'end of Meme coins.' While I sympathize with those who hope to see the end of Meme coins, as they are tired of such events, the fact is that the user demand for permissionless on-chain creation/speculation will not disappear. The same core user behaviors you see in the Meme coin space have existed before - whether it's Dogecoin, the ICO craze, NFT/DeFi - in an increasingly attention-driven economy, users will undoubtedly continue to want to trade on world events, culture, technology, and so on. That said, it is crucial for platforms to provide guardrails to ensure users can satisfy their needs as safely as possible. Here are some areas I believe should be focused on to achieve this goal: 1) Educating users on how to create tokens safely and ethically 2) Making the onboarding of new traders more user-friendly 3) Placing greater emphasis on user protection at the interface level. While no permissionless platform can completely eliminate negative outcomes on-chain, the interface can create a safer environment by reducing the visibility of tokens displaying suspicious trading patterns and setting reasonable default slippage settings (hint: slippage less than 20%)."

Odaily News reported that Alon Cohen, the co-founder of pump.fun, posted on X stating: "I am disgusted by the events surrounding LIBRA over the past few days. The people behind this project have gained significant personal benefits at the expense of many users, the ecosystem, and even entire countries. I hope the responsible parties are duly punished. I know the situation is still evolving, so if you are aware of any misconduct by any participants in the ecosystem, no matter how small, you should speak up. I also know that some people may be in difficult situations, so my DM is open so that I can provide assistance. The events of this weekend were particularly heartbreaking, as pump.fun was established to explicitly address some of the issues exposed over the past few days. Most importantly, the involvement of intermediaries such as 'development teams' and market makers is absurd - creating a Meme coin should be very simple, and anyone should be able to do it. The mere existence of such participants means that anyone can easily be exploited. Due to the damage caused by these events, many have stated that this could be the 'end of Meme coins'. While I sympathize with those who hope to see the end of Meme coins, as they are tired of such events, the fact is that the user demand for permissionless on-chain creation/speculation will not disappear. The same core user behavior you see in the Meme coin space has existed before - whether it's Dogecoin, the ICO craze, NFT/DeFi - in an increasingly attention-driven economy, users will undoubtedly continue to want to trade on world events, culture, technology, and so on. That said, it is crucial for platforms to provide guardrails to ensure users are as safe as possible while meeting their needs. Here are some thoughts on what to focus on to achieve this goal: 1) Educate users on how to create tokens safely and ethically 2) Onboarding new traders needs to be more user-friendly 3) User protection needs to be prioritized at the interface level. While no permissionless platform can completely eliminate negative on-chain outcomes, the interface can create a safer environment by reducing the visibility of tokens displaying suspicious trading patterns and setting reasonable default slippage settings (hint: slippage less than 20%)."

pump.fun Lianchuang: I hope that the party responsible for the LIBRA incident will be punished, and users’ demand for permissionless on-chain creation/speculation will not disappear.

"The launch of LIBRA is not a 'harvesting of scallions', but rather due to the failure of the plan that led to the market collapse."

A brief article to clarify the LIBRA token scam: from presidential endorsement to hacker tracking

Here is the English translation:

The crypto news reported that Jupiter released a statement regarding LIBRA: "From the beginning, Jupiter has placed great emphasis on transparency. The issuance of meme coins is a dirty game filled with all kinds of ugly behaviors. However, we have nothing to hide. Therefore, we can explain the following facts as clearly as possible. Some members of the Jupiter team were aware that at some point there would be a token project related to the Argentine President Milei. We learned this directly from Kelsier Ventures about 2 weeks ago. Although we were initially unsure, we later saw reliable evidence of Milei's personal account posts indicating that he was serious. This is all we know. We are completely unaware of the transactions between the responsible parties (in this case Milei and the market makers) and have not participated in any way. In the meme coin circle, it is an open secret that an 'Argentina Coin' will be launched at some point, as can be seen from many public posts that have since appeared. But to adhere to our confidentiality spirit, we have not discussed this with anyone online or offline. Additionally, no one on the team has received any LIBRA tokens or related compensation. No one knew the release date, time or CA in advance. Only Meow himself knew about it on the scheduled release day, but he did not know the CA or the specific time, and did not participate in any way. He was asleep in Tokyo when the token was released. Ben of Meteora knew the CA a few minutes before the release to verify it, but only shared it with the Jupiter team after the information was made public. Contrary to the large amount of FUD on X, we did not pre-verify or immediately verify the CA. Instead, we waited for public confirmation (again from Milei's X account) and sufficient trading volume. When we added LIBRA to the Strict List and displayed the 'Verified' tag in the Trenches product, its market cap had already reached around $1.5 billion. It was not until about 1 hour after the release that LIBRA received the 'Verified' icon in our default token search. Why verify it? The answer is simple: to protect users. Immediately after LIBRA, dozens of counterfeit tokens were launched, and without strict list verification, traders could easily accidentally purchase the wrong token. Our strict list has never endorsed a specific token, it is just our way of ensuring that users can purchase the correct token they intend to buy. By the way, our new organic scoring is aimed at helping to eliminate the need for this verification process, and instead let organic on-chain activity determine which tokens are the 'right' ones. We take allegations of insider trading extremely seriously. We have conducted our own investigation and found no evidence of any team members front-running. If you have evidence that Jupiter employees leaked information or front-ran in any other way, please contact us directly. If we find any team members taking action based on non-public information, we will take swift and decisive action. The whole LIBRA affair has been brutal, both for traders and for our ecosystem. In fact, many meme coins have long been detrimental to the ecosystem, with front-running, bundling, and all of this becoming the norm. We absolutely will not tolerate these extreme PVP releases. We are actively working on better internal and external systems to help improve the situation for everyone. As mentioned earlier, Meow will release a more detailed statement later today."

Jupiter issued a statement on LIBRA: No team members were found to have engaged in insider trading, and no one knew the release time or CA in advance

Here is the English translation:

It's time to go cross margin on ETH, Vitalik wins by waiting for the corpses of his opponents to float by.
Zhu Su is hinting at something.
We know that as the second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap, the price of ETH has been relatively sluggish in this bull market, and the Ethereum Foundation (EF) has also been...